Constructions denoting alternatives and preferences in the Altai language

In the section Linguistics
Constructions denoting alternatives and preferences in the Altai language
Авторы (текстом)
A. A. Ozonova
Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
Turkic languages, Altai language, complex sentence, semantic relations in com- plex sentence, denoting alternatives constructions, preferences constructions, alternatives (sugges- tions and rejections)
Abstract

The paper is devoted to the description of the syntactic constructions denoting alternatives in
the Altai language. Two semantic types of such constructions are distinguished: constructions
denoting alternatives and constructions denoting preferences. In the alternative denoting constructions, the action in the main clause does not correspond to the speaker’s expectations; in the preference denoting constructions, the action in the main clause is preferable compared to the action
in the subordinate clause. The contrast is revealed through the comparison of two actions. The
participial-postpositional construction with the postposition ордына ‘instead’ is used for the first
type, and the four adverbial participial constructions with the form with =ганча denote the second
type. Three of these constructions contain three components, with the rejected situation being
represented by the =ганча adverbial participle, and the preferred situation as a conditional one;
the main clause is a positive predicate артык ‘better’ or торт ‘better.’ In contrast to the participial-postpositional construction with the postposition ордына, these constructions contain the
evaluating components. The predicate of the main clause with ордына may only function as
an indicative, and the predicate of the main clause of the construction with =ганча may be used
in indicative, imperative, conjunctive, and other modal forms.

Bibliography

Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy. Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt [Types of linguistic
meanings. Evaluation. Event. Fact]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988.

Burkova S. I. Zamestitel’nye konstruktsii v nenetskom yazyke [Replacement constructions in
the Nenets language]. Yazyki korennykh narodov Sibiri. Novosibirsk, 2003, iss. 11, pp. 137–161.

Cheremisina M. I., Brodskaya L. M., Gorelova L. M., et al. Predikativnoe sklonenie
prichastiy v altaiskikh yazykakh [Predicative declension of participles in Altai languages]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1984, 191 p.

Orkina L. N. Aspektual’no-temporal’naya kharakteristika vyskazyvaniy s semantikoy obuslovlennosti v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Aspectual-temporal characteristic of sentences with the
semantics of conditioning in modern Russian]. Abstract of Dr. philol. sci. diss. St. Petersburg,
2000.

Russkaya grammatika. T. 2. Sintaksis [Russian Grammar. Vol. 2. Syntax]. N. Yu. Shvedova
(Ed.). Moscow, Nauka, 1980.

Shamina L. A. Polipredikativnyye sinteticheskiye predlozheniya v tuvinskom yazyke
[Polypredicative synthetic sentences in the Tuva language]. Novosibirsk, Sibirskiy khronograf,
2001, 250 p.

Skribnik E. K., Darzhayeva N. B. Buryatskie konstruktsii sopostavleniya-predpochteniya
[Buryat constructions denoting alternatives and preferences]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2016,
no. 3, pp. 263–280.

Tybykova A. T., Cheremisina M. I., Tybykova L. N. Sintaksis oslozhnennogo predlozheniya v
altayskom yazyke [Syntax of a complicated sentence in the Altai language]. Gorno-Altaysk, RIO
Gorno-Alt. univ., 2013, 268 p.

Bibliographic reference
A. A. Ozonova Constructions denoting alternatives and preferences in the Altai language // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2019. № 4. Pp. 281–289. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/69/24.