The paper focuses on the issues of grammaticalization of Tuvan verbal constructions (VC).
The author analyses specific lexical elements of the bipredicative models resulting in the formation
of new (monopredicative) models on the basis of constructions with nominal predicates. It is predicative
units (SPU) and meanings expressed by them. Lexemes with an ability to evaluate dictum
positions expressed by predicative subjects serve as predicates of main predicative units (MPU).
The paper studies the grammaticalized SPU that formally fulfil the subject functions and serve
primarily to record the results of mental operations regarding the events of reality (evaluation,
classification, identification, etc.).
The pragmatic evaluative component of lexemes demonstrates the speaker’s attitude towards
the denoted object or the addressee of one’s speech, and also carries the specific information regarding
the speech actions that may be performed with the help of these lexemes. Based on
evaluative semantics, the formally main PU is replaced by pronouns, verbs, and (in most cases)
evaluative lexemes, resulting in the emergence of regular, frequent grammaticalized constructions.
Such constructions, confirming the existence/nonexistence of various facts, their certainty/
uncertainty, and their correlation with various circumstances (or lack thereof) by means of
their evaluative components, can be defined as grammaticalized syntactic (analytical) constructions,
with predicates possessing broad evaluative meanings.
Such models of subject constructions may be used to broaden the variety of characteristics
of finite predicates. Unlike the bipredicative complement constructions, these grammaticalized
constructions contain lexical forms that lack case valence in their modus predicates.
Arutyunova N. D. Predlozhenie i ego smysl: Logiko-semanticheskie problemy [Sentence and its meaning: Issues of logic and semantics]. Moscow, Nauka, 1976, 383 p.
Arutyunova N. D. Semanticheskaya spetsifika imen litsa i imen predmetov [Semantic traits of personal names and names of objects]. In: Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and world of humans]. Moscow, LRC Publ. House, 1999, pp. 61–64.
Cheremisina M. I., Brodskaya L. M., Gorelova L. M., et al. Predikativnoe sklonenie prichastiy v altaiskikh yazykakh [Predicative declination of participles in Altai languages]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1984, 191 p.
Strukturnyye tipy sinteticheskikh polipredikativnykh konstruktsiy v yazykakh raznykh sistem [Structural types of polipredicative synthetic constructions in languages of various systems]. Novisibirsk, Nauka, 1986, 320 p.
Cheremisina M. I. Nekotorye voprosy teorii slozhnogo predlozheniya v yazykakh raznykh sistem [Some issues of theory of complex sentences in languages of various systems]. Novosibirsk, NSU Publ., 1979, 82 p.
Cheremisina M. I. Ob iz”yasnitel’noy konstruktsii s fakul’tativnym upravlyayemym mestoimeniyem “to” [On complement clauses with optional subordinate pronoun to]. In: Funktsional’nyy analiz sintaksicheskikh struktur [Functional analysis of syntactic structures]. Irkutsk, Irkutsk Univ. Publ., 1982, pp. 3–21.
Kobozeva I. M. Lingvisticheskaya semantika [Linguistic semantics]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2000, 352 p.
Koshkareva N. B. Ob osobennostyakh predstavleniya nauchnogo znaniya yazykom estestvennykh nauk [On the features of representation of scientific knowledge in the language of natural sciences]. Critique and semiotics. Iss. 14, Novosibirsk, 2010, pp. 360–372.
Melchuk I. A. Kurs obschei morfologii. T. 2: Morfologicheskie znacheniya [Course of general morphology. Vol. 2: Morphological meanings]. Moscow, LRC Publ. House, 1998, 544 p.
Shamina L. A. Modeli iz”yasnitel’nykh polipredikativnykh konstruktsiy s imennymi skazuyemymi v tuvinskom yazyke [Models of Tuvan polipredicative complement constructions with nominal predicates]. In: Yazyki korennykh narodov Sibiri [Native languages of Siberia]. Iss. 5, Novosibirsk, 1999, pp. 70–84.
subject constructions // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2018. № 3. Pp. 246–254. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/64/22.