The debating points of Brodsky’s religious subject and agenda are considered within this paper
alongside with the specificity of the poet’s lingual personality cognitive-pragmatic program
(CPP) in the aspect of generalized paradigms connected with faith, personal salvation and consolation.
“The faith plot” of Brodsky’s oeuvre is considered in skeptically, desperately and heroically
selected terms of common creative life “from the void and to the void”. Brodsky’s “archaic”
cognitive-pragmatic set (a selfish appeal to supreme forces in terms of his poetical mythology)
ascends to a global cognitive-pragmatic program of modernism (that revises the man-God relationship
in artist’s favor). Starting with the “pernicious” void, the poet comes to the salutary one,
keeping the Logos out of destruction by existential absurd.
The power of faith in Word and Literature, implicitly powered by romantic (neoromantic)
myth of artist underlying the entire modernist life-creation, gradually transfers the essence of the
question from the religiosity with its global consolation and salvation possibility into an individual
form of “quasi-religiosity”, through strictly devastating the religion symbols and filling them with purely artistic meaning. The poet as a “tool of language” is happy in his existential despair
for he is reunited with his deity and gives him the features of the universal power. The choice
within an “epilogue” version of modern life-creation is nevertheless limited by skepticism, despair,
and romantic heroism. While accepting life as the Gift, the poet does not accept its order and
the idea as something more significant, mysterious, and solemn than our distressful ego and finds
salvation in one of its manifestations – the Word.
Brodsky I. Sochineniya: V 7 t. [Works: in 7 vols]. Ya. A. Gordina (Ed.), G. F. Komarov
(Comp.). St. Petersburg, Pushkinskiy fond, 2001, vol. 1, 304 p.; vol. 2, 440 p.; vol. 3, 312 p.;
vol. 4, 432 p.; vol. 5, 376 p.
Erofeyev V. “Poeta daleko zavodit rech’...”: (Iosif Brodskiy: svoboda i odi-nochestvo) [“The
word may lead a poet far away...”: (Joseph Brodsky: freedom and loneliness)]. In: Erofeyev V. V.
V labirinte proklyatykh voprosov [In the maze of damned questions]. Moscow, Sov. pisatel’, 1990,
pp. 216–231.
Gaidenko P. P. Proryv k transtsendentnomu: novaya ontologiya XX veka [Breakthrough to the
transcendent: a new ontology of the 20th century]. Moscow, Respublika, 1997, 495 p.
Glazunova O. I. Iosif Brodskiy: metafizika i realnost [Joseph Brodsky: Metaphysics and Reality].
St. Petersburg, SPbU Faculty of Philology and Arts, Nestor-Istoriya, 2008, 312 p.
Jangfeldt B. Yazyk est bog. Zametki ob Iosife Brodskom [Language is god. Notes on Joseph
Brodsky]. B. Jangfeldt (Transl. from Swedish), A. Nesterov (Transl. from English). Moscow,
Astrel’, Coprus, 2012, 368 p.
Ivanov D. I. Tipologicheskiye osobennosti kognitivnogo soznaniya subyekta-logotsentrika
v russkoy rok-kulture [Typological features of the cognitive consciousness of the subjectlogocentric
in Russian rock culture]. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. 2016,
no. 12(66): in 4 pts, pt 4, pp. 100–105.
Ivanov D. I., Lakerbay D. L. Logotsentricheskaya programma yazykovoy lichnosti I. Brodskogo:
predvaritelnye zamechaniya [Logocentric program of the lingual personality of J. Brodsky:
preliminary observations]. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. 2017, no. 7(73):
in 3 pts, pt 1, pp. 24–27.
Lakerbay D. L. Ranniy Brodskiy: poetika i sudba [Early Works of Brodsky: Poetics and Fate].
Ivanovo, Ivanovo State Univ. Publ., 2000, 164 p.
Losev L. V. Iosif Brodskiy: Opyt literaturnoy biografii. 3-e izd., ispr. [Joseph Brodsky: Experience
of literary biography. 3rd ed., corr.]. Moscow, Mol. gvardiya, 2008, 447 p. (Zhizn’
zamechatel’nykh lyudey).
Lotman M. Y., Lotman Y. M. Mezhdu veshch’yu i pustotoy (Iz nablyudeniy nad poetikoy
sbornika Iosifa Brodskogo “Uraniya”) [Between the Being and the Void (The research of the
poetics of Joseph Brodsky’s book “Urania”)]. In: O poetakh i poezii [About poets and poetics].
St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo, 1996, p. 731–746.
Markish S. Iudey i Ellin? Ni Iudey, ni Ellin? [Jew and Greek? Neither Jew nor Greek]. In:
Iosif Brodskiy: trudy i dni [Joseph Brodsky: works and days]. P. L. Vayl’, P. V. Losev (Eds,
comps). Moscow, Nezavisimaya gaz., 1998, pp. 207–214.
Miłosz C. Bor’ba s udush’em [Struggle against choking]. In: Iosif Brodskiy: trudy i dni
[Joseph Brodsky: works and days]. P. L. Vayl’, P. V. Losev (Eds, comps). Moscow, Nezavisimaya
gaz., 1998, pp. 237–247.
Ranchin A. M. “Chelovek est ispytatel boli...”: Religiozno-filosofskie motivy poezii Brodskogo
i ekzistentsializm [“Man is a pain tester...”: Religious and philosophical motifs of Brodsky’s
poetry and existentialism]. In: Ranchin A. “Na piru Mnemoziny”: Interteksty Brodskogo [At
the feast of Mnemosyne: Brodsky’s intertexts]. Moscow, NLO, 2001, pp.146–174.
Verheul K. Tanets vokrug mira: Vstrechi s Iosifom Brodskim [Dance around the world: Meetings
with Joseph Brodsky]. I. Mikhailova (Transl. from Dutch). St. Petersburg, izd. zhurn.
“Zvezda”, 2002, 272 p.
Volkov S. Dialogi s Iosifom Brodskim [Conversations with Joseph Brodsky]. Moscow,
Nezavisimaya gazeta, 2000, p. 334.
the faith plot and his ‘routine’ devastation in J. Brodsky’s poetry // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2019. № 2. Pp. 136–147. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/67/13.