This paper discusses the process of juridization of the term “grazhdanin” (a citizen) in the social-
political discourse. At present, the lexeme “grazhdanin” and many others containing the root
-grazhd- have acquired juridical meanings and are used in legal texts. However, these lexemes were not considered as legal terms at first. The paper deals with the typology of the prejuridical
content of the word “grazhdanin.” This typology is based on a varying degree of similarity of the
public word semantics to the legal term status as a top point of the process of juridization. It is
supposed to identify the pattern of pre-juridical use of the lexeme concerned and its synchronous
results. The prejuridical status of a public word allows qualifying its meaning as semiterminological
value. The variety of semantic registers of the public terms, fixed at this stage,
does not disappear, leaving behind a trail of pre-juridic semantics and stylistic origin in the legal
texts. “Spontaneous” units of natural language are revealed through a set of synonyms in socialpolitical
discourse: “chelovek” (a human), a “grazhdanin” (a citizen), “lichnost’” (a personality),
and “litso” (a person). The diachronic discourse-semantic analysis of the interaction between prejuridical
and juridical meanings of the word “grazhdanin,” gradually incorporated into legal texts,
allows revealing a discourse-semantic pattern of a public term being incorporated into legal communication.
Belousova K. A. “Dolzhnaya osmotritel’nost’ i ostorozhnost’” pri vybore kontragenta kak otsenochnoye ponyatiye, ne zakreplennoye normoy zakona [“Due diligence and care” at contractor
selection as an evaluation notion not fixed by statutory provision]. Russian Judge. Publishing
Group “Jurist”. 2017, no. 4, pp. 8–12.
Brinev K. I. Metodologicheskiye problemy lingvisticheskoy ekspertizy: opredeleniye ponyatiya
“sotsial’naya gruppa” [Methodological problems of linguistic expertise: defining the essence
of extremism / defining the concept of “social group”]. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University.
2012, no. 2 (15), pp. 117–123.
Durinova G. V. Slovo i ponyatiye grazhdanin v russkom yazyke 18 v. (k voprosu o lingvisticheskoy
osnove istorii ponyatiya) [The word and the notion citizen in the Russian language of the
18th century: The problem of the linguistic basis of the history of concepts]. St. Tikhon’s University
Review. Series 3: Philology. 2015, iss. 1 (41), pp. 18–38.
Fan I. B. Politicheskaya ontologiya rossiyskogo grazhdanina: soderzhaniye protiv formy [Political
ontology of the Russian citizen: content versus form.]. Ekaterinburg, 2018, 332 p.
Golev N. D., Vorob’yeva M. E. Interpretatsionnoye funktsionirovaniye yuridiche-skogo yazyka
v obydennom soznanii: Monografiya [Functioning of juridical terms in ordinary consciousness
of native speakers of Russian: Monograph]. Kemerovo. KSU Publ. 2017, 117 p.
Golev N. D. Nauchnyye terminy kak edinitsy stikhiynogo funktsionirovaniya yazyka:
polemicheskiye zametki [Scientific terms as manifestations of spontaneous functioning of language:
polemic notes]. In: Metayazyk nauki: Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Metalanguage
of science: the proceedings of the International sci. conf.], Syktyvkar, 2012, pp. 5–1.
Golev N. D., Lebedeva N. B. Sovremennyy slovar’ dialektnoy leksiki [The modern online dictionary
of dialect vocabulary]. Siberian Journal of Philology. 2016, no. 2, pp. 125–133.
Golev N. D., Irkova A. V. Stanovleniye yuridicheskogo termina kak protsess yuridizatsii
obshchenarodnogo slova (diskursivno-semanticheskiy analiz leksem s kornyami chest- i dobr-)
[The making of a legal term out of a general word: a discursive and semantic analysis of words
with the roots chest- and dobr-]. Moscow State University Bulletin. 2018, no. 4, pp. 212–242.
Golev N. D. Yuridizatsiya estestvennogo yazyka kak lingvisticheskaya problema [Problem of
juridization of natural language in contemporary linguistics]. In: Yurislingvistika-2. Russkiy yazyk
v ego estestvennom i yuridicheskom bytii [Legal linguistics-2. Russian language in its natural and
legal existence]. Barnaul, 2000, pp. 8–40.
Kandaurova T. N. O kharaktere oppozitsiy v parakh sootnosimykh mezhdu soboy nepolnoglasnykh
i polnoglasnykh slov (na materiale drevnerusskogo pis’mennogo literaturnogo yazyka
11–14 vv.) [About the character of the opposition in pairs of related incomplete and full words
(on the material of the Old Russian written literary language of the 11–14th centuries)]. In:
Uchen. zap. Mosk. gos. ped. in-ta [Scientific works of Moscow State Pedagogical Institute]. Moscow,
1967, pp. 375–390.
Kozlachkova E. A. Sootnosheniye ponyatiy “chelovek”, “lichnost’”, “fizicheskoye litso”,
“grazhdanin” v rossiyskom prave [The correlation of definitions “human being”, “person”, “natural person”, “citizen” in Russian law]. Law and state: The theory and practice. 2014, no. 1,
pp. 17–20.
Kuznetsov A. M. Lingvisticheskiye tolkovaniya pravovogo smysla “prestupleniya” i “nakazaniya”:
yuridicheskaya teoriya i bytovyye stereotipy [Linguistic interpretation of legal sense of
terms “crime” and “punishment”: juridical theory and daily life stereotypes]. Moscow. INION
RAN Publ., 2012, 75 p.
Lukin P. V. Drevnerusskiye ponyatiya “gorozhanin”, “grazhanin”, “grazhdanin” [Ancient Russian
notions “gorozhanin”, “grazhanin”, “grazhdanin”]. Rossiyskaya istoriya. 2014, no. 4,
pp. 140–146.
Marasinova E. N. Raby i grazhdane v Rossiyskoy imperii 18 v. [Slaves and citizens in the 18th
century Russian Empire]. In: “Vvodya nravy i obychai Evropeyskiye v Evropeyskom narode”:
k probleme adaptatsii zapadnykh idey i praktik v Rossiyskoy imperii [“Introducing European morality
and customs into European society”: on the problem of adapting western ideas and practice
in the Russian Empire]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2008, pp. 99–118.
Mekhanoshina N. A., Filippova T. A. K voprosu ob opredelenii ponyatiya “pogloshcheniye”
[To the definition of the concept “takeover”]. Legal linguistics. 2016, no. 5, pp. 27–118.
Slovar’ russkogo yazyka 11–17 vv. [Dictionary of the Russian language of the 11–17th centuries].
S. G. Barxudarov (Ed.). Moscow, Nauka, 1977, iss. 4: G–D.
Smirnov O. M. K voprosu ob ustanovlenii ugolovno-protsessual’nogo znacheniya ponyatiy
“lichnost’”, “chelovek”, “grazhdanin”, “litso” i ikh sootnoshenii [To the question on the establishment of the criminal procedure meaning of the notions “personality”, “man”, “citizen”, “person” and their ratio]. Tomsk State University Journal. 2008, no. 307, pp. 98–99.
Ulukhanov I. S. Istoricheskoye slovoobrazovaniye. Istoricheskaya leksikologiya [Historical derivation.
Historical lexicology]. Moscow, OOO “LEKSRUS”, 2012, 368 p.
Ulukhanov I. S. Motivatsiya i proizvodnost’ (o vozmozhnostyakh sinkhronno-diakhronicheskogo
opisaniya yazyka) [Motivation and derivativeness (on the potential of synchronic-
diachronic description of language)]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language).
1992, no. 2, pp. 5–20.
Vashchenko Yu. S. Inoyazychnaya yuridicheskaya leksika v zakonodatel’nykh tekstakh: istoriya
poyavleniya, sovremennyye tendentsii i puti razvitiya [Foreign language law terms in legislative
texts: genesis, recent trends and ways of developing]. State and Law. 2018, no. 1, pp. 53–64.
Zhivov V. M. Razyskaniya v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoy kul’tury [Researches on the history
and prehistory of Russian culture]. Moscow. LRC Publishing House, 2002, 758 p.
in social-political discourse // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2019. № 3. Pp. 215–224. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/68/19.