(Dostoevsky’s novel “The Double”)
The paper examines the history of reception (from contemporary to later researchers, in particular,
formalists) of the novel “The Double” by Dostoevsky. In this novel, Gogol’s influence on
the young aspiring writer is clearly pronounced. The “total” character of Gogol’s influence on
early Dostoevsky is a philological axiom, with scholars interpreting it in different ways: in terms
of style, plot, and character typology. The paper considers the narrative model of the novel. The
proposed hypothesis is based on the idea of Gogol’s texts (“The Nose”, “Diary of a Madman”,
“The Overcoat”, “Dead Souls”) being extensively used in the novel, forming the narrative model
of the story. Anonymous citation is considered to be a determining factor for the narrative
model as a whole. The motivation for such a narrative model is given by the figure of the narrator,
alter ego of the aspiring writer. The “humble narrator”, author-dilettante, imitates Gogol, “unconsciously”
balancing on the brink of parody, but never crossing the style line. Unskilled copying,
being a result of excessive diligence of the follower, reproduces the model with absurd superfluity.
The writing, composed of quotations from Gogol’s texts and not marked out anywhere graphically,
often distorted, creates the effect of a simple and ingenuous rewriting “from memory”. The
paper describes various units of unquoted citation and methods of their use. The inversion, distortion,
addition, combination and others are considered as main methods of “processing” Gogol’s
fragments. A conclusion is drawn that pastiche, involving the fragments of Gogol texts, is key to
the narrative code. The author uses the concept “pastiche” in a broad sense. The basic method of
pastiche is retained: “seaming” or creating the narrative model from other text’s fragments is
saved but subject to another nonlinear compositional principle. The key point of the method can
be defined as multiple and multilayered structural impositions of different other text’s fragments
within one segment of the narrative field. In conclusion, the question of the need for a special type
of commentary on the text constructed in this way is actualized.
Aksakov K. S. Tri kriticheskiye stat’i gospodina Imyarek. III. Peterburgskiy sbornik, izdannyy
Nekrasovym [Three critical articles by Mr. Name. III. St. Petersburg collection, published by
Nekrasov]. In: Moskovskiy literaturnyy i uchenyy sbornik na 1847 god [Moscow literary and
scientific collection in 1847]. Moscow, 1847. Otd. kritiki
Bazylev V. N. Tri istochnika i tri sostavnykh chasti kommentariya (doklad) [Three sources
and three components of the commentary (report)]. In: Seminar “Problemy poeticheskogo
yazyka”. In-t russkogo yazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova RAN. 23 oktyabrya 2012 g. [Seminar “Problems
of poetic language”. V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute RAS, October 23, 2012].
URL: http://www.ruslang.ru/?id=seminar_fateeva_chronicle (accessed 12.10.2018).
Belyy A. Masterstvo Gogolya [Creative writing of Gogol]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1934.
Bem A. L. U istokov tvorchestva Dostoevskogo. Griboedov. Pushkin. Gogol’. Tolstoy i Dostoevskiy
[At the origins of Dostoevsky’s work. Griboedov. Pushkin. Gogol. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky].
Prague, 1936.
Bem A. L. Dostoevskiy – genial’nyy chitatel’ [Dostoevsky is a brilliant reader]. In: Bem A. L.
Issledovaniya. Pis’ma o literature [Researches. Letters about literature]. Moscow, 2001.
Bocharov S. G. Perekhod ot Gogolya k Dostoevskomu [Transition from Gogol to Dostoevsky].
In: Bocharov S. G. O khudozhestvennykh mirakh [About art worlds]. Moscow, 1985.
Chekhov A. P. Poln. sobr. soch. i pisem: V 30 t. [Complete works: in 30 vols]. Moscow,
1985.
Chudakov A. P. Kommentariy [Commentary]. In: Vinogradov V. V. Poetika russkoy
literatury [Poetics of Russian literature]. Moscow, 1976.
Chudakov A. P. K probleme total’nogo kommentariya “Evgeniya Onegina” [To the problem
of the total commentary on “Eugene Onegin”]. In: Pushkinskiy sbornik [Pushkin collection].
Moscow, 2005.
Gogol’ N. V. Poln. sobr. soch. V 14 t. [Complete works: in 14 vols]. AN SSSR, In-t rus. lit.
(Pushkinskiy Dom). Moscow, Leningrad, AN SSSR Publ., 1938, vol. 3; 1949, vol. 5; 1956,
vol. 6 (I).
Dilaktorskaya O. G. Peterburgskaya povest’ Dostoevskogo [Dostoevsky’s novel about St. Petersburg].
St. Petersburg, 1999.
Dostoyevskiy F. M. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 30 t. [Complete works: in 30 vols]. Leningrad,
Nauka, 1972, vol. 1.
Konstantinova N. V. “Gogolevskiy tekst” v rannikh proizvedeniyakh F. M. Dostoevskogo
[“Gogol’s text” in the early works of F. M. Dostoevsky]. Abstract of Philol. Cand. Diss. Novosibirsk,
2006.
Mednis N. E. Sverkhteksty russkoy literatury [Super-texts of Russian literature]. Novosibirsk,
2003.
Pushkin A. S. Sobr. soch.: V 10 t. [Collected works: in 10 vols]. Moscow, 1975.
Toporov V. N. Peterburgskiy tekst russkoy literatury. Izbrannye Trudy [Petersburg text
of Russian literature. Selected works]. Petersburg, 2003.
Tynyanov Yu. N. Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino [Poetics. History of literature. Cinema].
Moscow, 1977.
Tseytlin A. G. Povesti o bednom chinovnike Dostoevskogo: (K istorii odnogo syuzheta) [The
story of the poor official Dostoevsky: (to the story of a plot)]. Moscow, 1923.
Uspenskiy B. A. Poetika kompozitsii [Poetics of composition]. Petersburg, 2000.
Vinogradov V. V. K morfologii natural’nogo stilya (Opyt lingvisticheskogo analiza
peterburgskoy poemy “Dvoynik”) [On the morphology of natural style (the Experience of linguistic
analysis of the Petersburg poem “Double”)]. In: Vinogradov V. V. Poetika russkoy literatury
[Poetics of Russian literature]. Moscow, 1976.
Vinogradov V. V. Stil’ peterburgskoy poemy “Dvoynik” (Opyt lingvisticheskogo analiza)
[The style of the Petersburg poem “Double” (Experience of linguistic analysis)]. In: F. M. Dostoevskiy.
Stat’i i materialy [Articles and materials]. Petrograd, 1922, coll. 1.
Viktorovich V. A. Gogol’ v tvorcheskom soznanii Dostoevskogo [Gogol in the creative consciousness
of Dostoevsky]. In: Dostoevskiy: Materialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky: Materials and
research]. Petersburg, 1997, vol. 14.
(Dostoevsky’s novel “The Double”) // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2019. № 4. Pp. 74–87. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/69/7.