The paper regards the phenomenon of the so-called snowstorm text in Chekhov’s prose.
A snowstorm text is based on the archetypical meanings of chaos. The range of snowstorm valency
is undoubtedly wide: snowstorm as one of the major archetypical concepts in Russian literature
is related to the concepts of doom, choice, miracle, etc. The remarkable potential of snowstorm
texts is manifested in Yuletide-themed plots. A representative number of Chekhov’s texts has
been studied to prove their functional and semantic significance in his creative work: “The
Witch,” “On the Road” (both written in 1886), “The Thieves” (1890), “The Murder” (1895) and
“On Official Business” (1899). In the first short story, a snowstorm is connected with the anthropological
features of the main character. The deacon’s wife seems to possess incredible feminine
attractiveness, and winter snowstorm gives her a chance to lure her guests. In the short story
“On the Road,” snowstorm follows Christmas Eve, and some kind of miracle happens when the
female protagonist comprehends the outlook of another character named Licharev. The short story
“Thieves” reveals a certain social complex in the main hero’s inner world. Snowstorm constructs
the circumstance context in the narrative. If the snowstorm had never happened, nothing would
have mattered to Ergunov, and he would have never known his real social (asocial in his case) role. “The Murder” and “On Business” represent the character’s turn to religious belief (“The
Murder”) or need for social responsibility. Summing up, a snowstorm text induces existential
doubts and other basic emotions in characters. It helps them to understand the deepest meanings
of life.
Chekhov A. P. Poln. sobr. soch. i pisem: V 30 t. Sochineniya: V 18 t. [Complete works and
Letters: in 30 vols. Works: in 18 vols]. Moscow, Nauka, 1984, vol. 4, 544 p., vol. 5, 703 p., 1985,
vol. 7, 733 p., vol. 9, 543 p., 1986, vol. 10, 495 p.
Domanskiy Yu. V. Arkhetipicheskiy motiv zimney v’yugi v proze A. S. Pushkina i rasskaze
A. P. Chekhova “Ved’ma” [The archetypical motif of winter snowdrift in A.S. Pushkin’s prose
and A. P. Chekhov’s short story “The Witch”]. In: Materialy mezhdunar. pushkinskoy
konferentsii [Proceedings of the International Pushkin Conference]. Pskov, 1996, pp. 200–205.
Domanskiy Yu. V. Smysloobrazuyushchaya rol’ arkhetipicheskikh znacheniy v literaturnom
tekste: Posobiye po spetskursu [Sense-making role of archetypical meanings in literary text].
Tver’, TverSU, 2001, 94 p.
Kapinos E. V., Proskurina E. N., Romodanovskaya E. K. Predisloviye [Preface]. In: Slovar’-
ukazatel’ syuzhetov i motivov russkoy literatury [Glossary of the plots and motifs Russian literature].
Novosibirsk, SB RAS Publ., 2006, iss. 2, pp. 3–17.
Katayev V. B. Proza Chekhova: Problemy i interpretatsii [Cyekhov’s prose. Problems and interpretations].
Moscow, MSU Publ., 1979, 326 p.
Kozubovskaya G. P., Buzmakova M. Rasskaz A. P. Chekhova “Ved’ma”: Zhanrovyy
arkhetip [A. P. Chekhov’s short story “The Witch”. Archetype of genre]. In: Kul’tura i tekst [Culture
and text]. Barnaul, BSPU Publ., 2008, pp. 287–298.
Larionova M. Ch. “Ya stala ved’moy ot gorya i bedstviy, porazivshikh menya”: rasskaz
A. P. Ccekhova “Ved’ma” [“I became a witch because of sorrow and troubles which shook me.
A. P. Chekhov’s short story “The Witch”]. In: Tvorchestvo A. P. Chekhova. Retseptsii i interpretatsii.
Sb. materialov Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Creativity of A. P Chekhov. Receptions and
interpretations. Materials of intern. sci. conf.]. Rostov-on-Don, “Foundation” Publ., 2013, pp. 97–
106.
Literaturnyy arkhetipy i universalii [Literary archetypes and universals]. Moscow, RSHU,
2001, 433 p.
Lotman Yu. M. Simvolika Peterburga i problemy semiotiki goroda [The symbol system of
Petersburg and problems of urban semiotics]. In: Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Works on semiotic
systems]. Tartu, Tartu Uni. Press, 1984, iss. 18, pp. 30–45.
Meletinskiy E. M. Transformatsii arkhetipov v russkoy literature (Kosmos i Khaos, geroy
i antigeroy) [Transformation of archetypes in Russian Literature. Cosmos and Chaos, hero and
antihero]. In: Literaturnyye arkhetipy i universalii [Literary archetypes and universals]. Moscow,
RSHU, 2001, pp. 150–224.
Nagina K. A. Metel’ [Blizzard]. In: Russkiye literaturnyye universalii (tipologiya, semantika,
dinamika): Kollekt. monogr. [Russian literary universals (typology, semantics, dynamics): collective
monograph]. A. A. Faustov (Ed. in ch.). Voronezh, Nauchnaya kniga Publ., 2011, pp. 130–
192.
Nagina K. A. Semantika meteli v rasskaze A. P. Chekhova “Ved’ma” (pushkinskiy i tolstovskiy
kody v avtorskom prelomlenii) [Snowdrift semantics in A. P. Chekhov’s short story
“The Witch” (Pushkin’s and Leo Tolstoy’s codes in author’s vision]. Perm University Herald.
Russian and Foreign Philology. 2010, iss. 6 (12), pp. 131–138.
Nagina K. A. Universalii russkoy literatury (metel’, gory, sad, dom) [Universals of Russian
literature (snowdrift, mountains, garden, home)]. Voronezh, VSU Publ., 2016, 162 p.
Senderovich S. Ya. Chekhov – s glazu na glaz. Istoriya odnoy oderzhimosti: Opyt
fenomenologii tvorchestva [Chekhov in private. A story of one obsession. Experience in phenomenology
of creativity]. St. Petersburg, Dmitriy Bulanin, 1994, 287 p.
Sobennikov A. S. Sud’ba i sluchay v russkoy literature: Ot “Meteli” A. S. Pushkina k rasskazu
A. P. Chekhova “Na puti” [Doom and occasion in Russian literature. From A. S. Pushkin’s
“Snowdrift” to Chekhov’s “On a Way”]. In: Chekhoviana. Chekhov and Pushkin. Moscow,
Nauka, 1998, pp. 137–144.
Toporov V. N. Peterburg i peterburgskiy tekst russkoy literatury (Vvedeniye v temu) [Petersburg
and Petersburg text of Russian literature (introduction into subject matter)]. In: Trudy
po znakovym sistemam [Works on semiotic systems]. Tartu, Univ. of Tartu, 1984, iss. 18,
pp. 4–29.
Toporov V. N. Peterburg i “Peterburgskiy tekst russkoy literatury” (Vvedeniye v temu) [Petersburg
and Petersburg text of Russian literature (introduction to the theme)]. In: Toporov V. N.
Mif. Ritual. Simvol. Obraz: Issledovaniya v oblasti mifopoeticheskogo [Myth. Ritual. Symbol.
Image. Study on mythopoetics]. Moscow, “Progress” – “Kul’tura” Publ. group, 1995, pp. 259–
367.