Food intake situation as a conceptual basis for phraseme formation
in Russian and English languages

In the section Linguistics
Food intake situation as a conceptual basis for phraseme formation
in Russian and English languages
Авторы (текстом)
O. V. Avramenko, E. A. Yurina
Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation; Pushkin State Russian Language Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
phraseme formation, cognitive metaphor, gastronomic metaphor, language world- view
Abstract

The consideration is given to the propositional-frame structure of food intake situation as the
cognitive basis of phraseme formation in Russian and English languages. Figurative words and
expressions metaphorically motivated by the verbs est’, zhrat’, kusat’, gryzt’, zhevat’ and glotat’
in Russian and eat, bite, chew and swallow in English are analyzed. Their speech usage in Russian
and English literary and journalistic texts is studied. Phraseological units reflecting food intake
metaphors are systematized in terms of the semantics of the source image captured in the inner
form of the idiom and are structured into motivational-figurative paradigms of phraseological
representations of this source image. The study describes the methodology of identifying the bases of metaphorical projections underlying the phraseme formation. This methodology involves
three stages: 1. Analysis of semantics, inner form, and discourse functioning of phraseological
units; 2. Presentation of typical figurative representations common to certain linguistic culture;
3. Identification of metaphorical mappings basis demonstrating the abstractive propositional
scheme. The analysis resulted in the description of 11 universal typical figurative representations
attributed to Russian and English (British and American) linguistic cultures. The following con-
ceptual grounds were revealed: a) placement or concealment of an object within a confined space;
b) loss, disappearance of an object; c) filling of space; d) deformation, complete destruction of an
object as a result of breakdown; e) receiving, purchasing an object to meet the need for some-
thing. The food intake images presented in the semantics of phraseological units are used in two
languages under analysis for characterizing interpersonal relations, the influence of negative emotions on the human psyche, speech impact, competitive situations, gaining financial and material
benefits, intensive labor activity.

Bibliography

Alefirenko N. F. Frazeologiya v svete sovremennyh lingvisticheskih paradigm [Phraseology
in the light of modern linguistic paradigms]. Moscow, “Elpis” Publ., 2008, 271 p.

Arutyunova N. D. Predlozhenie i ego smysl: logiko-semanticheskie problemy [The sentence
and its meaning: logical-semantic problems]. Moscow, Nauka, 1976, 383 p.

Baranov A. N. Dobrovol’skiy D. O. Aspekty teorii frazeologii [Aspects of phraseology theory]. Мoscow, Znak, 2008, 656 p.

Baranov A. N. Ocherk kognitivnoy teorii metafory. Russkaya politicheskaya metafora (materialy k slovaryu) [Essay of cognitive theory of metaphor. Russian political metaphor (Materials
for the dictionary)]. Moscow, 1991, pp. 184–193.

Blinova O. I. Yavlenie motivacii slov: Leksikologicheskij aspekt [The phenomenon of words
motivation: Lexicological aspect]. Tomsk, 1984, 192 p.

Boychuk A. S. “Pishchevye” metafory kak sposob harakteristiki sovremennoj dejstvitel'nosti
[“Food” metaphors as a way of characterizing modern reality]. Sochi Journal of Economy. 2012,
no. 1 (19), pp. 178–181.

Chudinov A. P. Metaforicheskaya mozaika v sovremennoy politicheskoy kommunikatsii. 2-e
izd., stereotip. [Metaphorical mosaic in modern political communication: monograph. 2nd ed.
stereot.]. Ekaterinburg, USPU, 2005, 257 p.

Fillmor Ch. Freymy i semantika ponimaniya [Frames and semantics of understanding]. In:
Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics]. 1988, no. 23, pp. 52–93.

Gibbs R. W. Why idioms are not dead metaphors. Idioms: processing, structure, and interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993, pp. 57–77.

Gibbs R. W. Jr. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University
Press, 2008, 564 p.

Glucksberg S. Understanding figurative language: from metaphors to idioms. New York, Oxford University Press, 2001, 134 p.

Ilyukhina N. A. Metaforicheskiy obraz v semasiologicheskoy interpretatsii [Metaphorical image in semasiological interpretation]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2010, 321 p.

Kovshova M. L. Analiz frazeologizmov i kody kul'tury [Phraseological analysis and culture
codes]. The Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language.
2008, no. 67 (2), pp. 60–65.

Kövecses Z. Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York, Oxford University Press, 2002,
285 p.

Kubryakova E. S. Glagoly deystviya cherez ikh kognitivnye kharakteristiki [Action verbs
through their cognitive characteristics]. Logicheskiy analiz yazyka: Modeli deystviya. Мoscow,
1992, pp. 84–90.

Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1980,
256 p.

Lebedeva N. B. Polisituativnost’ glagol’noy semantiki (na materiale russkikh prefiksal’nykh
glagolov) [The polysituation of verb semantics (based on Russian prefixal verbs)]. Tomsk, TSU
Publ., 1999, 262 p.

Maximova T. V. Gastronomicheskaya metafora v raznyh tipah diskursa [Gastronomic meta-
phor in different types of discourse]. Vestnik of Pushkin LSU. 2013, iss. 4, vol. 1, pp. 176–181.

Minskiy M. Freymy dlya predstavleniya znaniy [Knowledge frames]. Moscow, Energiya,
1979, 151 p.

Mishankina N. A. Metafora v nauke: paradoks ili norma? [Metaphor in science: paradox
or norm?]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 2010, 282 p.

Nayak N. P., Gibbs R. W. Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms. Journal
of experimental psychology: general. 1990, no. 119, pp. 115–130.

Teliya V. N. Russkaya frazeologiya. Semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvo-kul’turologicheskiy aspekty [Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguocultural aspects]. Moscow,
LRC Publishing House, 1996, 285 p.

Yurina E. A. Obraznyy stroy yazyka [The figurative structure of language]. Tomsk, TSU
Publ., 2005, 156 p.

Yurina E. A. Vkusnye metafory: pishchevaya tradiciya v zerkale yazykovyh obrazov [Tasty
metaphors: food tradition in the mirror of language images]. Kokshetau, 2013, 238 p.

Yurina E. A., Zhivago N. A. Metaforizaciya pogloshcheniya pishchi v obraznom stroe russkogo yazyka [Metaphorization of food absorption in the Russian language figurative system].
Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2015, no. 3 (35), pp. 107–121.

Zhivago N. A. Semantika i pragmatika glagol’noj metafory edy (na materiale semanticheskoj
gruppy “Pogloshchenie pishchi pri pomoshchi zubov”) [Semantics and pragmatics of the verbal
food metaphor (based on the material of the semantic group “Food absorption with the help
of teeth”)]. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2017, no. 4 (72), pp. 167–174.

Bibliographic reference
O. V. Avramenko, E. A. Yurina Food intake situation as a conceptual basis for phraseme formation
in Russian and English languages
// Сибирский филологический журнал. 2020. № 1. Pp. 229–244. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/70/18.