The subject of analysis is the modal word “(i) deystvitel’no” (“(and) really”) not only as
a core marker of the modus category of consent but also as a syncretic marker of several modus
categories (consent, authorization, reliability, perception, metatext). The paper focuses on the
problem of interaction of these modus categories. The author identifies the components of modus
semantics of the modal word concerned in the text fragments of different styles, combining
a textocentric approach and distributive analysis. In scientific, memoir and publicist texts
“(i) deystvitel’no” may be found in a dialogical or monological context on the boundaries of sentences: а) interrogative and non-interrogative; b) non-interrogative and nonnterrogative. Not only is
the modus semantics of agreement explicit in dialogical unity, but also the “confidence in the information to be reported” is emphasized. In monological text fragments, due to its semantics as
the core marker of the modus category of consent, “(i) deystvitel’no” explicates the text categories of connectivity and dialogicity. As a syncretic marker of several modus categories, the modal
word “(i) deystvitel’no” often plays the role of the indicator of authorization modus key (seme
“speaker”) and metatext and emphasizes “the confidence in the information to be reported.” The
semantics of reaffirmation or consent, especially confident one, is due to the direct (visual) perception of the speaker.
In the novel by B. Okudzhava and the stories by K. Paustovsky, the modal word
“(i) deystvitel’no,” in fact, is regularly found in the various combinations of monological and dialogical speech. It occupies an initial position in the final paragraph and expresses the result
of the observer’s mental process.
Baranov A. N., Plungyan V. A., Rakhilina E. V. Gruppa edinits, svyazannykh s ideey real’nosti (deystvitel'no, v samom dele, na samom dele, v deystvitel’nosti [Group of units related to
the idea of reality (deystvitel’no, v samom dele, na samom dele, v deystvitel’nosti)]. In: Putevoditel’ po diskursivnym slovam russkogo yazyka [Guide to discursive Russian words]. Moscow,
1993, pp. 76–104.
Belyaeva E. I. Dostovernost’ [Authenticity]. In: Teoriya funktsional’noy grammatiki. Temporal’nost’. Modal’nost’ [The theory of functional grammar. Modality. Temporality]. Leningrad,
Nauka, 1990, pp. 157–170.
Buglak S. I. Modal’nyye slova i chastitsy kak sredstvo vyrazheniya podtverzhdeniya ili
oproverzheniya dostovernosti soobshchayemogo [Modal words and particles as a means of expressing confirmation or refutation of the authenticity of the reported]. Russkiy yazyk v shkole.
1990, no. 2, pp. 82–87.
Bulygina T. V., Shmelev A. D. Vozrazheniye pod vidom soglasiya [Objection under the guise
of consent]. In: Oblik slova [The word appearance]. Moscow, 1997, pp. 137–147.
Kornilov A. A. Vvodnyye elementy v russkoy rechi: Ucheb. posobie [Parenthesis-elements
in Russian speech: Textbook]. St. Petersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University Publ., 2003,
129 p.
Perfilyeva N. P. Metatekst v aspekte tekstovykh kategoriy[Metatext in the aspect of text categories]. Novosibirsk, NSPU Publ., 2006, 285 p.
Perfilyeva N. P. Pravila upotrebleniya slova deystvitel’no [Rules for the using of the word
deystvitel’no]. In: Aktualizatsiya semantiko-pragmaticheskogo potentsiala yazykovogo znaka:
mezhvuzovsk. sb. nauch. tr. [Actualization of semantic and pragmatic potential of language sign:
Interuniversity coll. of sci. art.]. N. P. Perfileva (Ed.). Novosibirsk, NSPU Publ., 1996, pp. 47–55.
Ryabtseva N. K. Yazyk i estestvennyy intellekt [Language and natural intelligence]. Moscow,
Academia, 2005, 640 p.
Yаkovleva E. S. Znacheniye i upotrebleniye modal’nykh slov, otnosimykh k razryadu pokazateley dostovernosti / nedostovernosti [The meaning and use of modal words, classified as indicators of reliability / unreliability]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 1983, 20 p.