The paper considers the possibility of applying an axiologically oriented interdisciplinary
psycholinguistic method to the analysis of A Writer’s Diary by F. M. Dostoevsky, a periodical
bestseller of the 1860–70s. Warmly received by contemporaries, A Writer’s Diary became almost
an outcast in the next century. For decades, it was overlooked by scientists until a comprehensive
historical and philological research, undertaken by I. L. Volgin, caused a new wave of scientific
interest to it. The analysis of A Writer’s Diary provides insight into value-oriented meanings
of the author’s consciousness, which were relevant not only for Russia of the second half of the
19th century but also for contemporary society given the social challenges and psychological
problems of the personality associated with the loss of values. The gospel ideals that formed the
basis of Dostoyevsky’s ideology never fade when it concerns searching for the “super sense”
of life. The writer’s method, whose life experience, worldview, and numerous insights are embodied in A Writer’s Diary, finds a response in the modern approaches of the existential analysis
of V. Frankl and Christian or “moral” psychology. These approaches extend the methodology
of psycholinguistics in axiological dimension. Some common features between new psychological approaches and the method of Dostoyevsky can be revealed: a personal approach, the openness of a personality to the future, axiological approach, the opposition of morality and utilitarianism, etc.
Artamonova L. A. “Dnevnik pisatelya” F. M. Dostoevskogo i “periferiynye” zhanry russkoy
literatury [“Writer’s diary” by F. M. Dostoevsky and “peripheral” genres of Russian literature].
Vestnik of Samar State University. 2012, no. 8/1 (99), pp. 153–156.
Bakhtin M. M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetic]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2017, 416 p.
Bratus’ B. S. Anomalii lichnosti. Psikhologicheskiy podkhod [Anomalies of personality. Psychological approach]. Moscow, Nikeya, 2019, 912 p.
Bratus’ B. S. Opponentnye krugi khristianskoy psikhologii [Opponent circles of Christian
psychology]. In: Khristianskaya psikhologiya v kontekste nauchnogo mirovozzreniya: Kollektivnaya monografiya [Christian psychology in the context of a scientific world outlook: Collective
monograph]. B. S. Bratus’ (Ed.). Moscow, Nikeya, 2017, pp. 196–249.
Bubnova I. A., Zykova I. V., Krasnykh V. V., Ufimtseva N. V. (Neo)psikholingvistika
i (psikho)lingvokul’turologiya: novye nauki o cheloveke govoryashchem [(Neo)Psycholinguistics
and (psycho)linguoculturology: new sciences about the speaking man]. Moscow, Gnozis, 2017,
392 p.
Dostoevskiy F. M. Dnevnik pisatelya [Writer’s diary]. In: Dostoevskiy F. M. Poln. sobr.
soch.: V 30 t. [Complete works: in 30 vols]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1982–1984, vols. 24–26.
Frankl V. Byt’ chelovekom oznachaet nayti smysl. 100 glavnykh slov [To be human means
to find meaning. 100 main words]. E. Lukas (Comp.). Moscow, Nikeya, 2018b, 176 p.
Frankl V. Doktor i dusha: Logoterapiya i ekzistentsial’nyy analiz [A doctor and a soul:
logotherapy and existential analysis]. Moscow, Al’pina non-fikshn, 2017, 338 p.
Frankl V. Volya k smyslu [The will to the meaning]. Moscow, Al’pina non-fikshn, 2018a,
228 p.
Kazinik M. Tayny geniev [Mysteries of geniuses]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2018, 320 p.
Kobylyanskiy V. I. Analiz zdorov’ya F. M. Dostoevskogo, ego lichnosti i tvorchestva s pozitsiy genetiki. Chast’ 1 [Health analysis of F. M. Dostoevsky, his personality and creativity from
the point of view of genetics. Pt. 1]. Clinical Medicine. 2015, no. 93 (2), pp. 24–33.
Kolesov V. V. Drevnerusskaya tsivilizatsiya: nasledie v slove [Old Russian civilization: heritage in the word]. Moscow, Institut russkoy tsivilizatsii, 2014, 1120 p.
Krasnykh V. V., Bubnova I. A. Nekotorye bazovye ponyatiya i osnovnye kategorii psikholingvokul’turologii [Some basic concepts and basic catheories of psycholinguoculturology]. Journal of Psycholinguistics. 2015, no. 25, pp. 168–174.
Krichevets A. I. O meste khristianskoy psikhologii v sisteme nauk [About the place of Christian psychology in the system of sciences]. In: Khristianskaya psikhologiya v kontekste nauchnogo mirovozzreniya: Kollektivnaya monografiya [Christian psychology in the context
of a scientific world outlook: Collective monograph]. B. S. Bratus’ (Ed.). Moscow, Nikeya, 2017,
pp. 183–195.
Kuz’mina M. A. K voprosu ob aksiologicheskom aspekte psikholingvisticheskogo metoda
[To the question of axiological aspect of psycholinguistic method]. Journal of Psycholinguistics.
2019, no. 3 (41), pp. 122–138.
Kuz’mina M. A. Metafora kak element metodologii nauchnogo poznaniya [Metaphor as an
element of methodology of scientific cognition]. Sociological Studies. 2006, no. 2, pp. 42–51.
Kuz’mina M. A. Metaforologiya barokko: teoriya metafory Emanuele Tezauro [Metaphorology of Baroque: Theory of Emanuele Thesauro Metaphor]. Vestnik of Novosibirsk State University. Series: “History and Philology”. 2005, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 50–59.
Landau B. Smysl sem’i. Praktiki semeynoy logoterapii po Viktoru Franklu [The meaning of
a family. The practice of family logotherapy on Victor Frankl]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2018, 320 p.
Levontina I. B. “Dostoevskiy nadryv” [“Dostoevsky strain”]. In: Klyuchevye idei russkoy
yazykovoy kartiny mira: Sb. st. [Key ideas of the Russian language picture of the world: Coll.
of art.]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2005, pp. 247–258.
Likhachev D. S. Zametki ob istokakh iskusstva [Notes about sources of art]. In: Likhachev D. S. Izbrannye trudy po russkoy i mirovoy kul’ture [Selected works on Russian and world
culture]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University of the Humanities and Social Sciences Publ.,
2006, pp. 5–13.
Shaposhnikova I. V. Pravoslavnaya kul’tura v nauke: aksiologicheskaya etnopsikholingvistika
[Orthodox culture in science: axiological ethnopsycholinguistics]. Journal of Psycholinguistics.
2016, no. 2 (28), pp. 303–323.
Slobodchikov V. I. Khristianskaya psikhologiya kak metodologicheskaya vozmozhnost’
[Christian psychology as a methodological possibility]. In: Khristianskaya psikhologiya v kontekste nauchnogo mirovozzreniya: Kollektivnaya monografiya [Christian psychology in the context of a scientific world outlook: Collective monograph]. B. S. Bratus’ (Ed.). Moscow, Nikeya,
2017, pp. 155–171.
Tseloval’nikova D. N. Osobennosti memuaristiki F. M. Dostoevskogo na stranitsakh “Dnevnika pisatelya” [Peculiarities of F. M. Dostoevsky’s Memoiristics on the pages of “Writer’s Diary”]. Izvestia of Saratov University. Series: Sociology. Politology. 2009, vol. 9, iss. 2, pp. 62–66.
Vasilyuk F. E. Opyt metodologicheskoy razmetki prostranstva khristianskoy psikhologii [Experience of methodological marking of the Christian psychology space]. In: Khristianskaya
psikhologiya v kontekste nauchnogo mirovozzreniya: Kollektivnaya monografiya [Christian psychology in the context of a scientific world outlook: Collective monograph]. B. S. Bratus’ (Ed.).
Moscow, Nikeya, 2017, pp. 250–286.
Volgin I. L. Vozvrashchenie bileta. Paradoksy natsional’nogo samosoznaniya [The return
of a ticket. Paradoxes of the national consciousness]. Moscow, Grant, 2004, 768 p.
Vygotskiy L. S. Psikhologiya iskusstva. Analiz esteticheskoy reaktsii [Psychology of Art.
Analysis of aesthetic reaction]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2017, 416 p.
Zakharov V. N. Dostoevskiy i Evangelie [Dostoevsky and the Gospel]. In: Evangelie Dostoevskogo: V 2 t. [Gospel of Dostoevsky: In 2 vols]. Moscow, Russkiy Mir, 2010, vol. 2: Issledovaniya. Materialy k kommentariyu [Studies. Materials for comments], pp. 5–35.