The paper examines complex sentences of Russian as a means of expressing the perception
category. The main sentence represents the situation of perception; the additional clause expresses
the perceived situation. The purpose of this paper is to analyze complex sentences with perception semantics in Russian and to identify the peculiarities of a combination of tenses. The study is
based on the examples found in “Russian National Corpus.” The novelty of the work is to consider the representation of the perception category, depending on conjunctions and the use of different tenses.
The situation of perception involves 1) a predicate of perceptual action, 2) a subject or
a perceptor who is a producer/controller of physical and mental actions. The object of perception
is a verbally expressed situation. An explicit expression of the perception situation suggests that
the narrator and perceptor are the same. In Russian, the perception category is expressed by complex sentences with an explanatory clause. Postposition of subordinate clauses introducing the
perceived situation is typical. Analysis has focused on complex sentences expressing the relationship between the perceiving and perceived parts.
Analysis of the examples allows arguing that complex sentences with conjunctions realizing
the perception category do not have any significant differences. Regardless of the conjunctions,
complex sentences with the semantics of perception are characterized by the coincidence of predicate tenses to express the simultaneity of perceived situation and situation of perception. It is
necessary to note the frequency of the Present tense to express the simultaneity with the perceived
situation in the Past tense. The Present tense acts as the Past tense.
Avdevnina O. Yu. Kategoriya vospriyatiya i sredstva ee vyrazheniya v sovremennom russkom
yazyke [Category of perception and means of its expression in modern Russian]. Abstract of Dr.
philol. sci. diss. Moscow. 2014, 47 p.
Bondarko A. V. K voprosu o pertseptivnosti [On the issue of perceptivity]. In: Sokrovennye
smysly: Slovo. Tekst. Kul’tura [The hidden meanings: Word. Text. Culture]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2004, pp. 276–282.
Fortunatov F. F. Izbrannye trudy [Selected works]. Moscow, Nauka, 1956, vol. 1, 188 p.
Kan Ch. Leksikograficheskaya kharakteristika i polevaya organizatsiya glagolov vospriyatiya
v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Lexicographic characteristics and field organization of perception verbs in modern Russian]. Abstract of Philol. Cand. Diss. Moscow, 2016, 21 p.
Kartsevskiy S. O. Bessoyuzie i podchinenie v russkom yazyke [Without unions and submission
in Russian]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language).1961, no. 2, pp. 134–154.
Kustova G. I. Tipy proizvodnykh znacheniy i mekhanizmy yazykovogo rasshireniya [Types
of derived meanings and mechanisms of language expansion]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House,
2004, 472 p.
Levitskiy Yu. A. Osnovy teorii sintaksisa [Fundamentals of syntax theory]. Moscow, Kniga,
2005, 283 p.
Lutfullina G. F. Reprezentatsiya situatsii vospriyatiya vremennymi formami angliyskogo
yazyka [Representation of perception situation by the forms of English tenses]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. 2015, no. 2 (34), pp. 23–33.
Moiseeva S. A. Glagoly vospriyatiya v zapadno-germanskikh yazykakh [Verbs of perception
in West Germanic languages]. Abstract of Dr. philol. sci. diss. Voronezh, 2006, 45 p.
Murav’eva N. Yu. Kategoriya pertseptivnosti v semantike glagola i v tekste [The category
of perceptivity in the semantics of a verb and in the text]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Moscow, 2008, 23 p.
Paducheva E. V. Glagoly vospriyatiya: opyt vyyavleniya struktury tematicheskogo klassa
[Verbs of perception: the experience of revealing the structure of a thematic class]. In: Problemy
funktsional’noy grammatiki. Semanticheskaya invariantnost’ / variativnost’ [Problems of functional grammar. Semantic invariance / variation]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 2003, pp. 75–100.