possessive syntactic constructions
The paper analyzes the structural models of Ket possessive constructions. The means of expressing possessive construction components and the ways of marking possessive relations
between the first possessive construction component denoting the subject of possession
(a possessor) and the second component indicating the object of possession (a possessum) are considered. The study is based on the conception proposed by E. Vajda, according to which
the possessive markers are possessive pronominal clitics, used as either clitics or proclitics,
depending on the context. Two-component and multiple-component constructions are identified. The two-component constructions contain a possessor, a possessum, and a linking marker, the semantic scope of which is a possessum. The non-expanded and expanded possessive
constructions are analyzed. Both the first and the second substantive component of the two-
component construction may be expanded by an attribute. The two-component constructions
having a possessor expanded by an attribute are characterized by a distant ordering of a possessor noun and a possessum noun, including distant positions of a possessive proclitic and
a possessum noun. The derivative processes of transforming possessive constructions are considered. The rising derivation process consists of embedding one more possessor into the construction with an original possessor. Both possessors are marked by appropriate possessive
pronominal clitics. It is found that in Ket, the recessive derivation of omitting a possessor
noun expressed by a personal pronoun stem is available as well, resulting in a construction
with a non-expressed (omitted) possessor. The corresponding possessive pronominal clitic
attaching proclitically to possessum noun is overtly retained at the surface morphosyntactic
level.
Bondarko A. V. Vstupitel’nye zamechaniya [Introductory remarks]. In: Teoriya
funktsional’noy grammatiki. Lokativnost’. Bytiynost’. Posessivnost’. O uslovlennost’
[Theory of functional grammar. Space localization. Beingness. Possession. Causality].
St. Petersburg, Nauka, 1996, pp. 99–100.
Dul’zon A. P. Ketskie skazki i drugie teksty [Ket tales and other texts]. Uchen. zap.
Tom. gos. ped. in-ta. 1962, vol. 20, iss. 2, pp. 144–180.
Dul’zon A. P. Ketskie skazki [Ket tales]. In: Ocherki po grammatike ketskogo
yazyka [Sketches on Ket grammar]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 1964, pp. 140–217.
Dul’zon A. P. Ketskie skazki [Ket tales]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 1966, 167 p.
Dul’zon A. P. Ketskiy yazyk [Ket language]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 1968, 635 p.
Dul’zon A. P. Ketskie skazki i drugie teksty [Ket tales and other texts]. In: Ketskiy
sbornik. Mifologiya, etnografiya, teksty [Studia Ketica. Mythology, ethnology, texts].
Moscow, Nauka, 1969, pp. 167–212.
Georg S. A descriptive grammar of Ket (Yenisei-Ostyak). Part 1: Introduction, Phonology, Morphology. Global Oriental Ltd, 2007, 328 p.
Kotorova E. G., Nefedov A. V. Tipologicheskie kharakteristiki ketskogo yazyka:
vershinnoe ili zavisimostnoe kodirovanie? [Typological features of the Ket language:
the head or dependancy marking?]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language). 2006, no. 5, pp. 43–56.
Kreynovich E. A. Glagol ketskogo yazyka [The verb in the Ket language]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1968a, 283 p.
Kreynovich E. A. Ketskiy yazyk [The Ket language]. In: Yazyki narodov SSSR. T. 5:
Mongol’skie, tunguso-man’chzhurskie i paleoaziatskie yazyki [USSR peoples languages. Vol. 5: Mongolian, Manchu-Tungis and Paleo-Siberian languages]. Leningrad,
Nauka, 1968b, pp. 53–473.
Kreynovich E. A. Zagadki [Puzzles]. In: Ketskiy sbornik. Mifologiya, etnografiya,
teksty [Studia Ketica. Mythology, ethnology, texts]. Moscow, Nauka, 1969, pp. 231–
235.
Kryukova E. A. Imennye posessivnye konstruktsii v ketskom yazyke [Possessive
noun constructions in Ket]. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. 2015,
4 (10), pp. 55–61.
Kryukova E. A. Predikativnye posessivnye konstruktsii v ketskom yazyke (korpusnoe issledovanie) [Possessive predicative constructions in Ket (corpus-driven research)]. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. 2016, no. 4 (14), pp. 22–36.
Kryukova E. A., Glazunov P. Yu. Ket texts. In: Annotirovannye fol’klornye teksty
obsko-eniseyskogo yazykovogo areala [Annotated folklore prose texts of the Ob-Yenisei
language area]. Тоmsk, Veter, 2010, pp. 185–211.
Kryukova E. A., Nefedov A. V. Vyrazhenie posessivnykh otnosheniy v ketskom
yazyke: prototipichnye konstruktsii i periferiya [Possessive relations in Ket: prototypical constructions and peripheral cases]. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology.
2017, no. 4 (18), pp. 42–55.
Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary].
V. N. Yartseva (Ed. in Ch.). Moscow, Sov. entsikl., 1990, 685 p.
Nichols J. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language. 1986,
vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 56 – 119.
Vajda E. J. Ket. In: Languages of the World / Materials. 204. Lincom Europa, 2004,
99 p.
Vajda E. J. Head-negating enclitics in Ket. In: Subordination and coordination
strategies in North Asian languages. E. J. Vajda (Ed.). Amsterdam, 2008, pp. 179–201.
(Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series IV, Current
issues in linguistic theory, ISSN 0304-0763; vol. 300)
Vajda E. J. Vestigial possessive morphology in Na-Dene and Yeniseian. In: Working
papers in Athabaskan (Dene) languages 2012. Alaska native language center working
papers. Sharon Hargus, Edward Vajda, Daniel Hieber (Eds). Fairbanks, AK: ANLC,
2013a, no. 11, pp. 79–91. URL: https://www.uaf.edu/anlc/docs/Vajda_2013_ Vestigial.pdf (accessed: 21.03.2021).
Vajda E. J. Metathesis and reanalysis in Ket. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. 2013b, no. 1 (1), pp. 14–26.
Werner H. Die ketische Sprache. Wiesbaden, 1997, 407 S.
possessive syntactic constructions // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2021. № 2. Pp. 235–251. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/75/17.