features of understanding and reproducibility
The paper presents the results of an experimental study of the proper names that have changed
or acquired emotional and evaluative connotations over the last 30 years (the connotative
names used in a figurative sense in the texts of different genres). The experiment, 200 re-
spondents from Volgograd and Tyumen involved two stages: first, the degree of names
recognition was determined, second, the level of reproducibility of these names in a figurative
meaning was identified. Socio-political situation changes tend to lead to significant semantic
shifts in the meaning of well-known connotative names. Of particular relevance is the post-
Soviet period, a new stage in the history of modern Russia, due to having affected both the
economic and political processes in the country and the value priorities of Russian society re-
flected in the language of the last three decades. Psycholinguistic methods for studying lexical
semantics, namely, the method of addition and synonymous replacement and the method of
restoring incomplete utterance, were applied to establish the features of understanding and re-
producibility of connotative names of the post-Soviet period by native speakers of the Russian
language. The results allow ranking the names according to the degree of recognition (low,
medium, or high) and marking the levels of reproducibility (names with stable or lost connotations). The regional and age peculiarities of understanding and reproducing the connotative
names of the post-Soviet period are noted. The prospects and relevance of the lexicographic
description of the connotative names are determined.
Belyanin V. P. Vvedeniye v psikholingvistiku [Introduction to Psycholinguistics].
Moscow, CheRo, 1999, 128 p.
Berezovich E. L. Russkaya onomastika na sovremennom etape: kriticheskiye
zametki [Russian onomastics at the present stage: critical notes]. The Bulletin of the
Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language. 2001, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 34–
46.
Bol’shakov I. A. Dva metoda sinonimicheskogo perefrazirovaniya v lingvisticheskoy
stenografii [Two methods of synonymous rephrasing in linguistic shorthand]. 2009.
URL: http://masters.donntu.org/2009/fvti/larionova/ library/article13.htm (accessed:
09.02.2020).
Khves’ko T. V. Imya v soznanii cheloveka [Name in human consciousness]. Cognitive studies of language. 2015, iss. 24, pp. 296–304.
Kryukova I. V. Aksiologicheskaya konnotatsiya imeni sobstvennogo: dinamicheskiy
aspect [Axiological connotation of the proper name: dynamic aspect]. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. 2019, no. 10, pp. 161–166.
Kryukova I. V. Rublevka v russkoy lingvokul′ture [Rublevka in Russian linguistic
culture]. Russkaya Rech’ (Russian Speech). 2018, no. 3, pp. 102–107.
Kryukova I. V. Semanticheskaya zhizn’ konnotativnogo toponima Uryupinsk [The
semantic life of the connotative toponym Uryupinsk]. In: Rekviem filologicheskiy.
Pamyati E. S. Otina: Sb. nauch. tr. [Requiem philological. To the memory of E. S. Otin:
Coll. of sci. papers]. Kiev, Dmitry Burago Publ. House, 2015, pp. 269–276.
Kryukova I. V., Vrublevskaya O. V., Kirpicheva O. V. Imena sobstvennyye v makroi mikrosotsiume [Proper names in macro- and microsocium]. Volgograd, VSSPU Publ.
“Peremena”, 2016, 168 p.
Langendonck W. Theory and typology of proper names. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter,
2007, 378 p.
Neklesova V. Yu. Prototipicheskoye dublirovaniye v onomasticheskom
assotsiativnom eksperimente [Prototypic duplication in an onomastic associative experiment]. Science and Education a New Dimension: Phylology. 2013, vol. 4, pp. 73–75.
Nenasheva T. A. Konnotativnaya semantika referentno odnoznachnogo imeni [The
connotative semantics of a reference single-valued name]. N. Novgorod, Publ. H.
of NSTU named after R. E. Alekseev, 2012, 153 p.
Nicolaisen W. F. H. Are there Connotative Names? Names. A Journal of Onomastics. 1978, vol. 26, pp. 41–47.
Nikonov V. A. Imya i obshchestvo [Name and society]. Moscow, Nauka, 1974, 278 p.
Nyström S. Names and Meaning. In: The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming.
C. Hough, D. Izdebska (Eds). Oxford, OUP, 2016, pp. 39–51.
Otin E. S. Slovar’ konnotativnykh sobstvennykh imen [Dictionary of connotative
proper names.]. Donetsk, Yugo-Vostok, Ltd, 2004.
Slovar’ russkogo yazyka: V 4 t. [Dictionary of the Russian language: In 4 vols]. 2nd
ed., rev. and suppl. Moscow, Rus. yaz., 1982.
Trapeznikova A. A. Onomasticheskoye soznaniye sovremennogo gorozhanina [Onomastic consciousness of a modern city dweller]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. Krasnoyarsk,
2010.
Vrublevskaya O. V. Pretsedentnyye antroponimy politicheskogo diskursa kak sredstvo sotsial’noy otsenki [Case-law anthroponyms of political discourse as a means of
social assessment]. Political Linguistics. 2019, no. 5, pp. 131–139.
Zubkova L. I. Kul’urnaya obuslovlennost’ antroponimicheskoy konnotatsii [Cultural
conditioning of anthroponymic connotation]. Tambov University Review. 2008, no. 8,
pp. 146–152.
features of understanding and reproducibility // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2021. № 3. Pp. 177–190. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/76/14.