“Resurrection” and “discovery” in Chekhov’s artistic world

In the section Study of literature
“Resurrection” and “discovery” in Chekhov’s artistic world
Авторы (текстом)
Andrei D. Stepanov
St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
Anton Chekhov, discovery narrative, theme of resurrection, evolution of Realism
Abstract

This paper defines the specific character of A. P. Chekhov’s oeuvre by comparing a series of his “discovery stories” (a term coined by V. B. Kataev) with the thematic line of “resurrection” characteristic of Russian realism in general, and the works of L. N. Tolstoy and F. M. Dostoevsky in particular. Drawing upon contemporaneous literary critiques, the study reveals that Chekhov’s attempts to depict moral regeneration in characters (Laevsky in “The Duel,” Asorin in “The Wife,” Yakov Terekhov in “The Murder”) were invariably regarded as unpersuasive by reviewers. At the same time, the “discovery stories” did not evoke such rejection. In Chekhov’s universe, no change that affects a character is assuredly permanent: his characters are typically not marked by resolute determination, keen intellect, strong conviction, or even reliable memory. The endings of “The Lady with the Dog” and “The Bishop,” masterpieces in which researchers typically find the author’s unconditional assertion of the possibility of “resurrection,” are similarly not devoid of pessimistic overtones. These observations, viewed through historical and literary lenses, substantiate the thesis of literature’s independent evolution: the shift from a religious, moral “resurrection” to a secular, epistemological “discovery” at the end of the nineteenth century is not consistent with the simultaneous rise of God-seeking and mysticism. However, this phenomenon, while not fully validated as a literary-historical fact pending corroboration with various instances, including secondary and tertiary literature, continues to be a highly plausible theory.

Bibliography

Byalyy G. A. Russkiy realizm kontsa XIX v. [Russian realism of the late 19th century]. Leningrad, LSU, 1973, 168 p.

Herlth J. “An upheaval was so necessary”: Authorial conversion and the literary public in nineteenth-century Russia (Gogol, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky). In Models of personal conversion in Russian cultural history of the 19th and 20th centuries. J. Herlth, C. Zehnder (Eds.). Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Oxford, Wien, Peter Lang, 2015, pp. 71–94.

Kataev V. B. Proza Chekhova: problemy interpretatsii [Chekhov’s prose: problems of interpretation]. Moscow, MSU, 1979, 327 p.

Lotman Yu. M. Syuzhetnoye prostranstvo russkogo romana XIX veka [Plot space of the Russian novel of the 19th century]. In Lotman Yu. M. V shkole poeticheskogo slova: Pushkin. Lermontov. Gogol: kniga dlya uchitelya [In the school of the poetic word: Pushkin. Lermontov. Gogol: a book for a teacher]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye, 1988, 
pp. 325–348.

Mann Yu. V. V poiskakh zhivoy dushi: “Mertvyye dushi”. Pisatel’ – kniga – chitatel’ [In search of a living soul: “Dead souls”. Writer – book – reader]. Moscow, Kniga, 1984, 351 p.

Nilsson N. Å. Studies in Čekhov’s narrative technique (“The Steppe” and “The Bishop”). Stockholm, Stockholm Uni. Press, 1968, 110 p. (Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis. Stockholm Slavic Studies 2).

Shmid V. Narratologiya [Narratology]. Moscow, LRC Publ., 2003, 312 p.

Smirnov I. P. Psikhodiakhronologika: psikhoistoriya russkoy literatury ot romantizma do nashikh dney [Psychodiachronology: the psychohistory of Russian literature from romanticism to the present day]. Moscow, NLO, 1994, 351 p.

Stepanov A. D. Problemy kommunikatsii u Chekhova [Problems of communication in Chekhov]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2005, 400 p.

Toporov V. N. Mif. Ritual. Simvol. Obraz: issledovaniya v oblasti mifopoeticheskogo: izbrannoye [Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image: research in the field of mythopoetics: selected works]. Moscow, Progress – Kul’tura, 1995, 624 p.

Tynyanov Yu. N. Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino [Poetics. History of literature. Cinema]. Moscow, Nauka, 1977, 574 p.

Tyupa V. I. Khudozhestvennost’ chekhovskogo rasskaza [The artistry of Chekhov’s story]. Moscow, Vyssh. shk., 1989, 135 p.

Tyupa V. I. Narratologiya kak analitika povestvovatel’nogo diskursa (“Arkhiyerey” A. P. Chekhova) [Narratology as an analysis of narrative discourse (“The Bishop” by A. P. Chekhov)]. Tver, Izd-vo Tver. gos. un-ta, 2001, 58 p.

Tyupa V. I. Slovar’ motivov kak nauchnaya problema (na materiale pushkinskogo tvorchestva) [Dictionary of motifs as a scientific problem (based on Pushkin’s works)]. In Slovar’-ukazatel’ syuzhetov i motivov russkoy literatury: eksperimental’noye izdaniye [Dictionary-index of plots and motifs of Russian literature: experimental edition]. E. K. Romodanovskaya (Ed.). Novosibirsk, 2006, iss. 1, pp. 170–197. 

Bibliographic reference
Andrei D. Stepanov “Resurrection” and “discovery” in Chekhov’s artistic world // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2026. № 4. Pp. 69–81. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/97/5.