Structural and taxonomic classification of complex long vowels

In the section Linguistics
Structural and taxonomic classification of complex long vowels
Авторы (текстом)
Nikolay S. Urtegeshev, Olga N. Morozova
Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation;
Amur State University, Blagoveshchensk, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
complex long vowels, diphthong, duphon, diphthongoid, fusional vowel, interrupted vowel, V-shaped f0 modulation, pharyngealization, experimental phonetics
Abstract

This paper presents a structural-taxonomic classification of complex long vowels. The classification is formulated based on articulatory, acoustic, and perceptual criteria. The experimental dataset includes information from multiple languages: Turkic (Tuvan, Shor), Tungusic (Udege), Finno-Ugric (Surgut Khanty), alongside the isolated Odul, Chinese (Sino-Tibetan family, third tone), and Russian (Indo-European family, Slavic group). Two main subgroups of complex long vowels are distinguished: two-component (diphthongs, duphons, diphthongoids, and fusional vowels) and three-component (interrupted vowels). The classification follows the principle of increasing internal structural complexity alongside the degree of component fusion. The following characteristics are taken into account: quantitative duration parameters (absolute syllable duration, mean sound duration, absolute and relative vowel duration), formant characteristics (F1, F2), intensity dynamics, and fundamental frequency (f0). The study establishes that vowel length is not an independent feature but a derivative of internal articulatory-acoustic inhomogeneity. Furthermore, it proposes a unified gradation scale for speech signal intensity (ranging from “very weak” to “extra strong”) and refines the formula for calculating relative sound duration. The concept of contrastive length is introduced to describe cases in which vowel auditory distinction is attained through a duration variation of less than a factor of two in the ultra-short versus short opposition. Emphasis is placed on the V-shaped f0 modulation in Chinese and Tuvan, identified as a typologically rare phenomenon. The findings of the study contribute to the typology of vocalism and can be applied in automatic speech recognition systems.

Bibliography

Badrtdinova A. A. Ogublennyye glasnyye v menzelinskom govore srednego dialekta tatarskogo yazyka [Rounded vowels in the Menzelinsky dialect of the middle dialect of the Tatar language]. In Sovremennyye issledovaniya zvuchashchey rechi: sb. nauch. st. II Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Modern research of sounding speech: collection of scientific articles of the II International scientific conference]. Minsk, 2024, pp. 92–98.

Badrtdinova A. A. Varianty glasnykh fonem na territorii rasprostraneniya srednego dialekta tatarskogo yazyka [Variants of vowel phonemes in the middle dialect of the Tatar language]. Abstract of Cand. philol. sci. diss. Kazan, 2025.

Bicheldey K. A. Faringalizatsiya v tuvinskom yazyke [Pharyngealization in the Tuvan language]. 2nd ed. Moscow, RUDN, 2001, 290 p.

Bol’shaya rossiyskaya entsiklopediya [BRE – Great Russian encyclopedia]. Diftong [Diphthong]. URL: https://bigenc.ru/c/diftong-d93e71 (accessed 10.05.2026).

Dambyra I. D. Vokalizm kaa-khemskogo govora v sopostavlenii s drugimi govorami i dialektami tuvinskogo yazyka [Vocalism of the Kaa-Khem dialect in comparison with other dialects of the Tuvan language]. Novosibirsk, Sibirskiy khronograf, 2005, 224 p.

Faringalizatsiya kak tipologicheskiy priznak fonologicheskikh sistem (na materiale tyurkskikh yazykov Yuzhnoy Sibiri) [Pharyngealization as a typological feature of phonological systems (based on the Turkic languages of Southern Siberia)]. I. Ya. Selyu-
tina, N. S. Urtegeshev, T. R. Ryzhikova, I. D. Dambyra, S. V. Kechil-ool. Novosibirsk, Omega Print, 2014, 312 p.

Ishkil’dina L. K. Dufon [oa] v karaidel’skom govore severo-zapadnogo dialekta bashkirskogo yazyka [Duphon [oa] in the Karaidel subdialect of the Bashkir language northwestern dialect]. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. 2024, no. 2 (44), pp. 21–34. DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2024-2-21-34

Ishkil’dina L. K. Glasnyy tipa “a” v ayskom govore vostochnogo dialekta Bashkirskogo yazyka [Vowel of the “a” type in the Aysky dialect of the eastern dialect of the Bashkir language]. In Akademicheskaya gumanitarnaya nauka v XX – nachale XXI v.: dostizheniya, trendy i perspektivy razvitiya [Academic humanities in the 20th – early 21st century: achievements, trends and development prospects]. Ufa, IIYaL UFITs RAN, 2022, pp. 228–235.

Ishkil’dina L. K. Osobyye tipy glasnykh v karaidel’skom govore severo-zapadnogo dialekta bashkirskogo yazyka [Special vowel types in the Karaidel subdialect of the Bashkir language northwestern dialect]. Ufa Humanitarian Journal. 2026, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15–23. DOI: 10.31833/sifk/2026.3.1.2

Iskhakov F. G., Pal’mbakh A. A. Grammatika tuvinskogo yazyka. Fonetika i morfologiya [Grammar of the Tuvan language. Phonetics and morphology]. Moscow, Vost. lit., 1961, 472 p.

Kormushin I. V. Udykheyskiy (udegeyskiy) yazyk [The Udyhe (Udege) language]. Moscow, Nauka, 1998, 319 p.

Kurdyumov V. A. Kurs kitayskogo yazyka. Teoreticheskaya grammatika [A course in the Chinese language. Theoretical grammar]. Moscow, LADA, 2005, 575 p.

Morozova O. N., Androsova S. V., Gibalin V. S. Yest’ li diftongi v orochonskom yazyke? [Are there diphthongs in the Orochon language?]. Ural-Altaic Studies. 2018, no. 4 (31), pp. 247–256.

Nadelyaev V. M. Proyekt universal’noy unifitsirovannoy foneticheskoy transkriptsii (UUFT) [The project of universal unified phonetic transcription (UUFT)]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1960, 68 p.

Saaya O. M. Dolgiye glasnyye tuvinskogo yazyka: v sravnenii s tyurkskimi yazykami Yuzhnoy Sibiri i mongol’skimi [Long vowels of the Tuvan language: in comparison with the Turkic languages of Southern Siberia and the Mongolian languages]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. Novosibirsk, 2005, 142 p.

Selyutina I. Ya. Foniko-fonologicheskiye issledovaniya yazykov narodov Sibiri v LEFI im. V. M. Nadelyaeva Instituta filologii SO RAN [Phonic-phonological studies of the languages of the peoples of Siberia at the V. M. Nadelyaev Laboratory of Experimental Phonetics]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language). 2016, no. 3 (22), pp. 68–79.

Trakhterov A. L. Angliyskaya foneticheskaya terminologiya [English phonetic terminology]. Moscow, Izd-vo lit. na inostr. yaz., 1962, 348 p.

Urtegeshev N. S. Fonetika chulymsko-tyurkskogo yazyka po zapisyam 70-kh godov XX veka [Phonetics of the Chulym Turkic language based on records of the 1970s]. Ural-Altaic Studies. 2016, no. 1 (20), pp. 105–110.

Urtegeshev N. S. Uklad yazyka v rotovoy polosti kak dopolnitel’naya artikulyatsiya glasnykh [The position of the tongue in the oral cavity as an additional articulation of vowels]. Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal [Siberian Journal of Philology]. 2023, no. 1, pp. 226–242. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/82/17

Urtegeshev N. S., Koshkareva N. B. Sistema dolgikh glasnykh zvukov pervogo sloga v surgutskom dialekte khantyyskogo yazyka [The system of long vowels of the first syllable in the Surgut dialect of the Khanty language]. Bulletin of Ugric Studies. 2017, no. 3 (30), pp. 72–97.

Vokalizm zvuchashchey rechi narodov Rossii i zarubezh’ya: kollektivnaya monografiya [Vocalism of spoken speech of the peoples of Russia and abroad: collective monograph]. O. N. Morozova, S. V. Androsova, S. I. Guseva, Yu. P. Ivanashko, 

V. G. Karavayeva, I. Li, Nur A. Aayl, B. Ya. Osipov, E. A. Protsukovich, T. R. Ryzhikova, I. Ya. Selyutina, Ya. V. Streke, N. S. Urtegeshev. Blagoveshchensk, AmGU, 2024, 198 p.

Zinder L. R. Obshchaya fonetika: ucheb. posobiye [General phonetics: a textbook]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Vyssh. shk., 1979, 312 p.

Bibliographic reference
Nikolay S. Urtegeshev, Olga N. Morozova Structural and taxonomic classification of complex long vowels // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2026. № 4. Pp. 188–207. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/97/14.