Рассматриваются теоретические и методологические особенности риторического подхода к анализу политической коммуникации в зарубежной лингвистике (2010–2018 гг.).
Выделяются основные направления риторического подхода (риторический критицизм,
анализ рефрейминга, семиотический анализ, текстуальный анализ), а также основные тематические области, привлекающие внимание исследователей данного направления (теоретико-методологическая проблематика, исследование идиолектов политических лидеров,
метафорологические изыскания, анализ институциональных дискурсов, изучение риторических стратегий, сопоставительные исследования).
Особенность современного риторического подхода заключается в том, что не всегда
можно провести четкую границу между публикациями, выполненными в рамках традиционного риторического направления, и исследованиями, учитывающими особенности иных
подходов. Риторические исследования характеризуются переплетением и филиацией идей,
предложенных в рамках когнитивной лингвистики и дискурс-анализа.
Будаев Э. В., Чудинов А. П. Зарубежная политическая лингвистика. М.: Флинта; Наука, 2008. 352 с.
Будаев Э. В., Чудинов А. П. Метафора в политической коммуникации. М.:
Флинта; Наука, 2012. 248 с.
Будаев Э. В., Чудинов А. П. Риторическое направление в исследовании политической метафоры // Respectus Philologicus. 2006. № 9 (14). С. 10–19.
Anikin E. E., Budaev E. V., Chudinov A. P. Historical dynamics of metaphoric systems
in Russian political communication // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2015.
№ 3. С. 26–32.
Antelmi D., Santulli F. The presentation of a new Government to Parliament from
ritual to personalisation: A case study from Italy // European Parliaments under Scrutiny.
Discourse strategies and interaction practices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010.
P. 111–134.
Arthur D., Woods J. The Contextual Presidency: The Negative Shift in Presidential
Immigration Rhetoric // Presidential Studies Quaterly. 2013. Vol. 43, issue 3. P. 468–
489.
Baur J. E., Parker E., Buckley M. R., Ferris G. R. More than one way to articulate
a vision: A configurations approach to leader charismatic rhetoric and influence //
The Leadership Quarterly. 2016. Vol. 27, issue 1. P. 156–171.
Benoit W. A functional analysis of presidential television advertisements. Lanham:
Lexington Books, 2014a. 284 p.
Benoit W. Political Election Debates: Informing Voters about Policy and Character.
Lanham: Lexington Books, 2014b. 144 p.
Bevitori C. Negotiating conflict: Interruptions in British and Italian parliamentary
debates // Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse / Ed. by P. Bayley.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004. P. 87–110.
Bruteig Y. M. Czech parliamentary discourse: Parliamentary interactions and the
construction of the addressee // European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse strategies
and interaction practices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010. P. 265–302.
Coe K., Schmidt A. America in Black and White: Locating Race in the Modern Presidency,
1933–2011 // Journal of Communication. 2012. Vol. 62, issue 4. P. 609–627.
Debras C., L’Hôte E. Framing, metaphor and dialogue: A multimodal approach to
party conference speeches // Metaphor and the Social World. 2015. Vol. 5 (2). P. 177–
204.
Didriksen A., Gjesdal A. M. On what is not said and who said it: Argumentative
connectives in Nicolas Sarkozy’s speeches to the European Parliament // Speaking of
Europe. Approaches to complexity in European political discourse / Ed. by K. Fløttum.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2013. P. 85–110.
Ewald P. Rostock, das Sydney der Ostsee – Zur Spezifik von Namenmetaphern //
Methoden der Metaphernforschung und –analyse / M. Junge (Hrsg.). Wiesbaden:
Springer, 2014. S. 197–213.
Gherairi J. Persuasion durch Protest. Protest als Form erfolgsorientierter, strategischer
Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2015. 612 S.
Gries L. Still Life with Rhetoric: A New Materialist Approach for Visual Rhetorics.
Logan: Utah State University Press, 2015. 336 p.
Hernández-Guerra C. Textual, intertextual and rhetorical features in political discourse:
the case of President Obama in Europe // Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas
Aplicadas. 2013. Vol. 8. P. 59–65.
Ilie C. Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish parliaments:
A rhetorical approach // Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse
/ Ed. by P. Bayley. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004. P. 45–86.
Ilie C. Managing dissent and interpersonal relations in the Romanian parliamentary
discourse // European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse strategies and interaction
practices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010. P. 193–222.
Inigo-Mora I. Rhetorical Strategies in the British and Spanish parliaments // European
Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse strategies and interaction practices. Amsterdam:
John Benjamins, 2010. P. 329–372.
Kjeldsen J. E. Speaking to Europe: A Rhetorical approach to Prime Minister Tony
Blair’s speech to the EU Parliament // Speaking of Europe. Approaches to complexity
in European political discourse / Ed. by K. Fløttum. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2013.
P. 19–42.
Lorda C. U. The Government control function of the French National Assembly in
Questions au gouvernement // European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse strategies
and interaction practices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010. P. 165–190.
Mandziuk R. M. Whither the good wife? 2016 presidential candidate spouses in the
gendered spaces of contemporary politics // Quarterly Journal of Speech. 2016. Vol. 4.
P. 1–24.
Marques M. A. The public and private sphere in parliamentary debate: The construction
of the addresser in the Portuguese Parliament // European Parliaments under Scrutiny.
Discourse strategies and interaction practices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010.
P. 79–108.
McComiskey B. Dialectical Rhetoric. Logan: Utah State University Press, 2015. 228 p.
Middleton M., Hess A., Endres D., Senda-Cook S. Participatory Critical Rhetoric.
Theoretical and Methodological Foundations for Studying Rhetoric in Situ. Lanham,
MD: Lexington Books, 2015. 240 p.
Nilsson B., Lundgren A. Logics of rurality: Political rhetoric about the Swedish
North // Journal of Rural Studies. 2015. Vol. 37. P. 85–95.
Ornatowski C. M. Parliamentary discourse and political transition: Polish Parliament
after 1989 // European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse strategies and interaction
practices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010. P. 223–264.
Plug H. J. Ad-hominem arguments in the Dutch and the European Parliaments: Strategic
manoeuvring in an institutional context // European Parliaments under Scrutiny.
Discourse strategies and interaction practices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010.
P. 305–328.
Ritchie L. D., Thomas M. A “glowing marble”: “brushed with clouds” or “parched,
scorched, and washed away”? Obama’s use of contrasting metaphors and stories in
framing climate change // Metaphor and the Social World. 2015. Vol. 5. P. 1–19.
Simpson P., Mayr A. Language and Power. London; New York: Routledge, 2010.
272 p.
Stuckey M. Political Rhetoric. A presidential briefings. New Brunswick: Transaction
Publishers, 2015. 125 p.
Trager R., Vavreck L. The Political Costs of Crisis Bargaining: Presidential Rhetoric
and the Role of Party // American Journal of Political Science. 2011. Vol. 55, issue 3.
P. 526–545.
Zarefsky D. Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation. New York: Springer, 2014.
265 p.
Zima E., Brône G., Feyaerts K. Patterns of interaction in Austrian parliamentary debates:
On the pragmasemantics of unauthorized interruptive comments // European Parliaments
under Scrutiny. Discourse strategies and interaction practices. Amsterdam:
John Benjamins, 2010. P. 135–164.