The pragmatic aspect of Vs. N. Nekrasov’s polemical texts of the 1990s and 2000s in the context of the post-Soviet cultural situation

In the section Study of literature
The pragmatic aspect of Vs. N. Nekrasov’s polemical texts of the 1990s and 2000s in the context of the post-Soviet cultural situation
Авторы (текстом)
Mikhail E. Sapкykin
Bakhrushin Theatre Museum, Moscow, Russian Federation;
The Boris Shchukin Theatre Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
Vsevolod Nekrasov, unofficial literature, post-Soviet literature, literary pragmatics, Lianozovo group, conceptualism, polemical text
Abstract

Employing the methodology of literary pragmatics, this paper analyzes the corpus of Vs. N. Nekrasov’s polemical texts from the 1990s and 2000s to determine their immanent structure and the goals the author sought to achieve. Despite the triumph of unofficial literature during this period, Nekrasov, a member of the Lianozovo group and the Moscow conceptualist movement, maintained a sharply critical stance toward the new post-Soviet cultural hierarchies. Notably, the primary targets of his criticism were most often his former underground associates, rather than authors of mass literature or former representatives of official literature. Nekrasov’s critiques simultaneously address several aspects of post-Soviet culture: the silencing of both himself and his close artistic circle; the disproportionate dominance of theory over practice in cultural studies; the superficiality of literary critics; and the conformism and cronyism (blat) of former unofficial writers. The analysis reveals previously unnoticed reasons for the poet’s harsh ethical stance. Primarily, this stance stems from Nekrasov’s conviction that the relationship between the viewer and the artist must be built on horizontal connections, entirely devoid of intermediaries. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that Nekrasov constructs his polemical texts using the same techniques he employed in his poetry. Ultimately, his primary objective in producing such a substantial volume of critical texts was to purge the sociocultural space of actors whom he deemed superfluous to the artist-viewer relationship.

Bibliography

Alekseev V. Ideal’no drugiye: khudozhniki o shestidesyatykh [Perfectly different: artists about the sixties]. Moscow, NLO, 2022, 552 p.

Arsen’ev P. A. K konstruktsii pragmaticheskoy poetiki [Towards the construction of pragmatic poetics]. In Literatura fakta vyskazyvaniya. Ocherki po pragmatike i material’noy istorii literatury [Literature of the fact of utterance. Essays on pragmatics and the material history of literature]. St. Petersburg, démarche, 2019, pp. 102–112.

Berg M. Yu. Andegraund. Dva pokoleniya [Underground. Two generations]. In Andegraund. Itogi. Reviziya [Underground. Results. Revision]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Pal’mira, 2022, pp. 202–228.

Berg M. Yu. Literaturokratiya. Problema prisvoyeniya i pereraspredeleniya vlasti v literature [Literaturocracy. The problem of appropriation and redistribution of power in literature]. Moscow, NLO, 2001, 342 p.

Janecek G. Vsevolod Nekrasov, master paronymist. Slavic and East European Journal. 1989, no. 2 (33), pp. 275–292.

Kholin I. S. S minusom yedinitsa: povest’, dnevnik, zapiski [With a minus one: novella, diary, notes]. Vologda, 2020, 248 p.

Kukuy I. S. Yeshche raz ob etike i estetike: publitsistika Vs. N. Nekrasova v kontekste aktual’nykh strategiy kanonizatsii sovetskogo iskusstva [Once again about ethics and aesthetics: Vs. N. Nekrasov’s journalism in the context of current strategies for the canonization of Soviet art]. In Vosem’ velikikh [Eight great ones]. Moscow, RSUH, 2022, pp. 331–340.

Nekrasov Vs. N. Doyche Bukh [Deutsche Buch]. Moscow, Vek XX i mir, 1998a, 172 p.

Nekrasov Vs. N. Lianozovo. Moscow, Vek XX i mir, 1998b, 172 p.

Nekrasov Vs. N. Spravka: ChTO iz stikhov. GDE za rubezhom. KOGDA opublikovano (1975–1985): Stikhi Nekrasova [Reference: WHAT from poems. WHERE abroad. WHEN published (1975–1985): Nekrasov’s poems]. Moscow, Postskriptum, 1991, 79 p.

Nekrasov Vs. N. Stikhi 1956–1983 [Poems 1956–1983]. Moscow, Biblioteka Moskovskogo Kontseptualizma Germana Titova, 2012, 591 p.

Nekrasov Vs. N. Zhivu vizhu [I live I see]. Moscow, Krokin-Galereya, 2002, 243 p.

Savitskiy S. A. Andegraund: istoriya i mify leningradskoy neofitsial’noy kul’tury [Underground: history and myths of Leningrad unofficial culture]. Moscow, NLO, 2002, 223 p.

Sokolova O. V., Zakharkiv E. V. Pragmatika i poetika [Pragmatics and poetics]. Moscow, NLO, 2025, 328 p.

Van Dijk T. The pragmatics of literary communication. In Studies in the Pragmatics of Discourse. The Hague, 1981, pp. 243–263.

Venediktova T. D. Literaturnaya pragmatika: konstruktsiya odnogo proekta (Obzor issledovaniy literatury kak kommunikatsii) [Literary pragmatics: construction of a project (a review of studies of literature as communication)]. New Literary Observer. 2015, no. 5, pp. 326–345.

“Zhivem slovom”: Vsevolod Nekrasov v pis’makh i vospominaniyakh [“We live by the word”: Vsevolod Nekrasov in letters and memoirs]. G. V. Zykova, E. N. Penskaya (Comps., Eds.). Moscow, HSE Publishing House, 2022, 639 p.

Bibliographic reference
Mikhail E. Sapкykin The pragmatic aspect of Vs. N. Nekrasov’s polemical texts of the 1990s and 2000s in the context of the post-Soviet cultural situation // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2026. № 4. Pp. 132–145. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/97/10.