The conjunctive in Selkup dialects

In the section Linguistics
The conjunctive in Selkup dialects
Авторы (текстом)
Sergei V. Kovylin
Tomsk State Pedagogical University, Tomsk, Russian Federation;
Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
Ключевые слова
conjunctive, Selkup dialects, semantics, linguistic areas, isoglosses, irrealis, potentialis
Abstract

This paper analyzes an extensive volume of corpus and archival data, reexamining the functioning of the conjunctive mood in Selkup dialects. Specifically, the study formally analyzes its markers, examines its primary semantic features across different dialects, and delineates the isoglossic areas of marker distribution. The markers for the synthetic and analytical conjunctives form two intersecting areas: the synthetic marker -ne- appears in the southern, transitional, and central dialects, while the analytical marker ene is found generally in the northern dialects and partially in the southern Chaya and Ket areas. In the northern dialects, the analytical conjunctive appears only with verbs in the simple past tense, expressing hypothetical, unrealized, or desired actions. Conversely, in the southern, transitional, and central dialects, the synthetic conjunctive conveys real, hypothetical, and unreal actions, encoding desire and incentive. When unmarked by verb tense, it expresses indefinite temporal meanings and remains neutral regarding reality/irreality semantics. With additional temporal context, it conveys broader semantics, including irreality in the past and real possibility in the future. In the central Tym and Narym dialects, the synthetic conjunctive with narrative past tense verbs expresses hypothetical, unrealized, or desired meanings in the past. Furthermore, in the Belyi Yar idiom of the Ket dialect, the analytical conjunctive is used with simple past tense suffixes to express hypothetical, unrealized, or desired actions, and with present and future tense suffixes to indicate a possibility or wish projected onto the present or future.

Bibliography

Bybee J. Morphology. A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam, Benjamins, 1985, 235 p. (Typological Studies in Language 9).

Bybee J., Perkins R., Pagliuca W. The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, Uni. of Chicago Press, 1994, 398 p.

Givón T. Syntax: An Introduction. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 2001, vol. 1, 500 p.

Glushkov S. V., Baydak A. V., Maksimova N. P. Dialekty sel’kupskogo yazyka [Dialects of the Selkup language]. In Sel’kupy: ocherki traditsionnoy kul’tury i sel’kupskogo yazyka [Selkups: essays on traditional culture and the Selkup language]. 2nd ed. Tomsk, TPU, 2013, pp. 49–63.

Grigorovskiy N. P. Azbuka syussogoy gulani [ABC book for the Syussogoy Gulani]. N. P. Grigorovskiy (Comp.). Kazan, Izd. pravoslavnogo missionerskogo obshchestva, 1879, 49 p.

Janurik T. A. Szölkup nyelvjárások osztalyozása. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 80. Budapest, 1978, pp. 77–104.

Kuznetsova A. I., Khelimskiy E. A., Grushkina E. V. Ocherki po sel’kupskomu yazyku: tazovskiy dialekt [Essays on the Selkup language: Tazov dialect]. Moscow, MSU, 1980, 412 p.

Kuznetsova N. G. Grammaticheskiye kategorii yuzhnosel’kupskogo glagola [Grammatical categories of the South Selkup verb]. Tomsk, TSU, 1995, 285 p.

Kyunnap A. K probleme proiskhozhdeniya pokazateley nakloneniy i vremen v ural’skikh yazykakh [On the problem of the origin of mood and tense indicators in the Uralic languages]. Sov. finno-ugrovedeniye. Tartu, 1976, iss. 12, pp. 169–181.

Makariy (Nevskiy), yep. Besedy ob istinnom Boge i istinnoy vere na narechii obskikh ostyakov [Conversations about the true God and true faith in the dialect of the Ob Ostyaks]. Tomsk, 1900, 28 p.

Makariy (yep. Biyskiy). Materialy dlya oznakomleniya s narechiyem ostyakov Narymskogo kraya [Materials for familiarization with the dialect of the Ostyaks of the Narym region]. In Otchet ob Altayskoy i Kirgizskoy missiyakh Tomskoy yeparkhii za 1887 god. Prilozheniye no. 7 [Report on the Altai and Kirghiz missions of the Tomsk diocese for 1887. Appendix no. 7]. Tomsk, Tipo-lit. Mikhaylova i Makushina, 1888, pp. 51–65.

Mel’chuk I. A. Kurs obshchey morfologii [Course in general morphology]. V. A. Plungyan (Trans.), N. V. Pertsov, E. N. Savina (Eds.). Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 1998, vol. 2, 544 p.

Payne T. Describing morphosyntax. A guide for field linguists. Cambridge, Cambridge Uni. Press, 1997, 413 p.

Prokof’yev G. N. Sel’kupskiy (ostyako-samoyedskiy) yazyk [Selkup (Ostyak-Samoyed) language]. Leningrad, Izd. In-ta narodov Severa TsIK SSSR, 1935, pt. 1: Sel’kupskaya grammatika [Selkup grammar], 131 p.

Szabó L. Selkup texts with phonetic introduction and vocabulary. Bloomington, 1967, 62 p. (Uralic and Altaic Series).

Bibliographic reference
Sergei V. Kovylin The conjunctive in Selkup dialects // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2026. № 4. Pp. 208–221. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/97/15.